Comments on: Integrating Orbited with Web App Frameworks http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/ Blogging Comet Applications Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:52:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Nick http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-2917 Nick Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:06:12 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-2917 <p>I just keep shaking my head in amazement with every new thing I learn about Orbited.</p> <p>I tried this in built STOMP thingy with Orbited 0.7.0 and I am truly blown away. Absolutely fantastic.</p> I just keep shaking my head in amazement with every new thing I learn about Orbited.

I tried this in built STOMP thingy with Orbited 0.7.0 and I am truly blown away. Absolutely fantastic.

]]> By: RIA Revolution » Integrating Orbited with Web App Frameworks http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-1947 RIA Revolution » Integrating Orbited with Web App Frameworks Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:53:46 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-1947 <p>[...] Weisberg on the “Orbited” blog wrote about Orbited integration with web frameworks. Orbited in its forthcoming 0.7 version will smoothly integrate with web frameworks using message [...]</p> [...] Weisberg on the “Orbited” blog wrote about Orbited integration with web frameworks. Orbited in its forthcoming 0.7 version will smoothly integrate with web frameworks using message [...]

]]> By: Orbited Blog » Blog Archive » Django + Orbited 0.6.x Tutorial http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-1942 Orbited Blog » Blog Archive » Django + Orbited 0.6.x Tutorial Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:13:29 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-1942 <p>[...] that this uses a different technique than the STOMP method I described. Dark Porter takes advantage of the fact that Django and Orbited are both written in [...]</p> [...] that this uses a different technique than the STOMP method I described. Dark Porter takes advantage of the fact that Django and Orbited are both written in [...]

]]> By: Comet Daily » Blog Archive » Integrating Orbited with Web App Frameworks http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-1891 Comet Daily » Blog Archive » Integrating Orbited with Web App Frameworks Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:12:24 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-1891 <p>[...] Weisberg recently wrote about various patterns of integrating Orbited and a web framework. We’ve been doing a lot of work to move towards direct integration with message queues as the [...]</p> [...] Weisberg recently wrote about various patterns of integrating Orbited and a web framework. We’ve been doing a lot of work to move towards direct integration with message queues as the [...]

]]> By: Adrian Weisberg http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-1859 Adrian Weisberg Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:36:17 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-1859 <p>Fraggle: Try RabbitMQ (http://www.rabbitmq.com/). Also, you said "until 0.7 is released," so be aware that Morbid (the MQ that will be integrated into Orbited in 0.7) isn't scalable and was built for development and small deployments. The demands you're talking require a more high-performance solution like RabbitMQ. Let us know how it works out.</p> Fraggle: Try RabbitMQ (http://www.rabbitmq.com/). Also, you said “until 0.7 is released,” so be aware that Morbid (the MQ that will be integrated into Orbited in 0.7) isn’t scalable and was built for development and small deployments. The demands you’re talking require a more high-performance solution like RabbitMQ. Let us know how it works out.

]]> By: Fraggle http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-1853 Fraggle Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:05:05 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-1853 <p>Hi,</p> <p>It seems that ActiveMQ is not well suited to handle thousands of consumers at the same time. Do you recommend anything until 0.7 is released? (my needs are very simple: just a "activity" notification will be done thru "comet" - no persistence of message) However, we need to handle thousands of connexions established simultaneously (5k - 10k).</p> <p>Thanks!</p> Hi,

It seems that ActiveMQ is not well suited to handle thousands of consumers at the same time. Do you recommend anything until 0.7 is released? (my needs are very simple: just a “activity” notification will be done thru “comet” - no persistence of message) However, we need to handle thousands of connexions established simultaneously (5k - 10k).

Thanks!

]]> By: Ben Tremblay http://orbited.org/blog/2008/09/integrating-orbited-with-web-app-frameworks/#comment-1667 Ben Tremblay Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:59:08 +0000 http://orbited.org/blog/?p=113#comment-1667 <p>Thanks for the confirmation.</p> <p>On Twitter someone brought up Comet/Orbited. I admitted harkening back to Netscape's efforts with push ('97? '98?) and suggested to him that <em>cough</em> it calls for more design than most folk can manage.</p> <p>I tried the chat. Demo? With a right side-bar full of names that serves to list and nothing else? passive? un-linked? sterile? fallow? (What was I saying about design? I must have been ranting.)</p> <p>And the first thing I read when I come to the blog:</p> <blockquote>"... choose to use web application frameworks like Django or Ruby on Rails ...</blockquote> <p>I say tomato, you say Ruby ... I say potato, someone sez .NET.</p> <p>Meh ... while editing hurricane wiki links I came up with the notion for a QRSS digital mode for ham radio. That sounds like fun. This sounds like self-inflicted injury.</p> <p><strike>May God have mercy on your souls</strike> May you encounter happiness free from the root of suffering.</p> <p>-VA- --bentrem</p> Thanks for the confirmation.

On Twitter someone brought up Comet/Orbited. I admitted harkening back to Netscape’s efforts with push (’97? ‘98?) and suggested to him that cough it calls for more design than most folk can manage.

I tried the chat. Demo? With a right side-bar full of names that serves to list and nothing else? passive? un-linked? sterile? fallow? (What was I saying about design? I must have been ranting.)

And the first thing I read when I come to the blog:

“… choose to use web application frameworks like Django or Ruby on Rails …

I say tomato, you say Ruby … I say potato, someone sez .NET.

Meh … while editing hurricane wiki links I came up with the notion for a QRSS digital mode for ham radio. That sounds like fun. This sounds like self-inflicted injury.

May God have mercy on your souls May you encounter happiness free from the root of suffering.

-VA- –bentrem

]]>